Popular Posts

Monday, January 23, 2023

1963 32nd Monte Carlo Rally: Ewy Rosquist and Ursula Wirth Win ”Ladies Cup"

Mercedes-Benz rally drivers Ewy Rosqvist and Ursula Wirth win the coveted “Coupe des Dames” in the 32nd Monte Carlo Rally in 1963 with a Mercedes-Benz 220 SE “fintail” rally car. Photo of the award ceremony on 28 January 1963 by Princess Grace Patricia and Prince Rainier of Monaco. (Photo signature of the Mercedes-Benz Classic Archives: R10189

Ewy Rosqvist and Ursula Wirth win the Ladies’ Cup of the 32nd Monte Carlo Rally

  • Honoured by Princess Gracia Patricia of Monaco
  • Further success of the Argentina winners with the Mercedes-Benz 220 SE rally car
  • Triple class victory for Mercedes-Benz

In the gruelling 32nd Monte Carlo Rally from 20 to 24 January 1963, Mercedes-Benz wins the women’s classification that is usual at that time. The winners Ewy Rosqvist and Ursula Wirth receive the so-called “Ladies’ Cup”. In addition, there is a triple victory in Class 7 for vehicles from 2 to 3 litres of displacement. The team starts in Stockholm in 1963. Ewy Rosqvist and Ursula Wirth finish 16th overall in their Mercedes-Benz 220 SE “fintail” rally car after a close decision in the final race in Monte Carlo and win the “Coupe des Dames”, which is awarded since 1927. Princess Gracia Patricia of Monaco presents the prize to the two Swedish rally drivers on 28 January 1963. After the overall victory of the Rosqvist/Wirth team in the Argentine Touring Car Grand Prix in October and November 1962, attention is focused on the “Argentina winners” at the Monte Carlo Rally the following January. Out of a total of 296 starters, only 27 teams finish. In this field, Mercedes-Benz dominates Class 7 with a one-two-three victory (Eugen Böhringer/Peter Lang, Onni Vilkas/Esko Vainola and Ewy Rosqvist/Ursula Wirth) and fifth place (Rolf Knoll/Rolf Kreder) – all in a Mercedes-Benz 220 SE.


Sunday, January 22, 2023

The “Carnival of Speed” and the Indianapolis 500

Industrial America: The “Carnival of Speed” and the Indianapolis 500

It was industrial America that shaped auto racing and capitalist America cast the sport into a “Carnival of Speed.” To alleviate the risk to spectators and to ensure a paying audience, automobile racing transitioned from open road courses to closed tracks. This new phase was inaugurated in 1909, when the American Automobile Association took on organizational responsibility for the sport. At the same time, entrepreneur Carl Graham Fischer and partner James A. Allison had a 2.5 mile oval constructed 4 miles from downtown Indianapolis using crushed stone as a surface. Racing began at Indy in 1909, but the problem of thrown rocks and injured drivers and mechanics resulted in later paving the track  with bricks. 


1909

 The “Carnival of Speed” and the Indianapolis 500

3 dead in 1909 Race

In 1911 the first 500 mile race took place on Decoration (later Memorial) day, with driver Ray Harroun winning the inaugural race without a riding mechanic and using a rear view mirror.  

1911 Program


At the time critics were calling for an end to racing due to the high death toll.  Even driver Barney Oldfield got into the debate, stating that “I was never famous until I went through the fence at St. Louis and killed two spectators. Promoters fell over one another to sign me up.” 

1904 St. Louis


 In addition to the major races sanctioned by the AAA, there were hundreds of other events held at state fairs and by “circus” barnstormers. Randall L. Hall characterized the early sport as one linked to manufacturers with the vague promise that the mayhem was somehow connected to technical progress, while in fact in reality it was a commercial spectacle.

Industrial America spawned automobile racing. In this sport, individuals compete for prizes by operating complex machines at the fastest speed possible. They travel a designated course   and follow strict rules. Fans far removed from participation pay for the privilege of watching (and hearing, smelling and feeling) the spectacle. “Carnival of speed” was the label given to many early races. This characterization is apt, for automobile races are simply particularly modern form of show business, a circus on wheels. And like other niches of entertainment industry, racing’s success lies in organizing and promoting the product. 

By 1913 with the entrance of three French Peugeots in the Indianapolis 500 field, the race became a battle of nations.


French race car driver Jules Goux (1885-1965) winning the Indianapolis 500 on May 30, 1913


J.C. Burton’s poem, published in Motor Age, reflected the nationalistic sentiments of the day: 

"O! my sons, give heed to the gods of speed

When they call on you today;

There's a race to run form the starting gun

Till the bolts and nuts give way;

And the call to fight is a challenge old

From the men who dare to the men who're bold.

Thus does the Motherland implore her sons

            With nerves of steel

To Conquer Space in grueling race and grind

            Time 'neath the wheel;

Full well she knows to what rare heights

Her daring sons aspire,--

Projectile laws are shot with flaws before

Supreme desire…." 


The French reigned supreme at Indianapolis between 1913 and 1916. But with World War one and the coming of the Duesenberg brothers and Harry Miller, the winds of racing supremacy between Europe and America soon shifted. In 1916 Miller rebuilt a Peugeot engine for driver Bob Burman, and in the process began designing and building power plants superior to the pre-war Peugeot twin cam, 4 valve per cylinder engines. Such was the transition that in 1921, driver Jimmy Murphy, piloting a Miller-powered Duesenberg, won the French Grand Prix race, the first American to do so.

Jimmy Murphy 1920


 Thus, at the opening of the Roaring Twenties, Americans not only could make very fast cars more than competitive on the world stage, they could also make inexpensive cars for the masses, thanks to Henry Ford.

Thursday, January 19, 2023

The American Automobile Industry Goes to War: World War I, 1917-1918

PHOTOGRAPHS FROM DETROIT PUBLIC LIBRARY

World War I: War Without End

Crowd of workers inside factory for World War I rally, large American flag hung from rafters, stage with U.S. and British flags has performer and other seated men. Recorded in glass negative ledger: "D/History-European war, 1914-1918.



World War I rally in Dodge Bros. plant. Recorded in glass negative ledger: "D/History-European war, 1914-18."


While strict American involvement in World War I was relatively brief (March 1917 to November of 1918), the event’s long term consequences to the development American automobile industry beyond 1918 was significant.77 The War brought to completion the establishment of industry standards, a problem recognized as early as 1911.  For example, by 1918 some 200 different tire sizes were reduced to only 32 used by manufacturers.  Standardization was led by Hudson’s Howard Coffin and the Society of Automotive Engineers(SAE). Initially a fringe group, by the end of the war the SAE took a leadership role in the creation and dissemination of automotive technology, a place it holds to this day.   Automotive technology would be critically linked to the development of aviation engine technology during the war; most significantly Packard’s Jesse Vincent played the key role in the design of the Liberty V-8 and V-12 engines. 

View of drafting room tracings for Packard airplane engines and Liberty airplane engines. Printed on front: "Packard, Liberty." Accompanying sheet reads: "Photographs of drafting room tracings of Packard and Liberty engines."

A further development of note was that of the burgeoning growth of truck manufacturing.  Charles Nash, formerly of General Motors and the head his namesake firm in 1917, became the leading manufacturer in assembling trucks. 

View of F-W-D Model B truck. Military truck has "U.S. Ord. Dept." on canvas cover. Printed on front: "Four Wheel Drive Auto Co., Clintonville, Wis., U.S.A." Typed on back: "Typical of the thousands of FWD trucks built for the U.S. and Allied armies during World War I is this famous Model B. FWD trucks were used to transport men, guns and ammunition to the front and as ambulances to bring wounded back to hospitals." Handwritten on back: "Motor trucks--F-W-D.

 Trucks were increasingly seen as being pivotal to the war effort, and particularly important to the French success in holding the Germans at bay during the battle of Verdun. It was said that without motor trucks Verdun would have fallen to the Germans in this struggle of attrition. Pierce-Arrow trucks were among those supplying the front lines during this battle that was described as a “crucible.” American luxury automobile makers, with long wheelbase vehicles, converted their products to trucks, and output doubled between 1917 and 1918.

View of a Ford 2-man tank, used during World War I. Handwritten on back: "Ford 2-man tank, World War I. Credit: Col. Robert J. Icks Collection. Ford 3 ton light tank, c. 1918. 3.4 tons, max. speed 8 mph, two Ford Model T engines, one cal. 30 machine gun. Historical motor vehicles."


In sum, despite a record year of production in 1917, American automobile manufacturers also found capacity to make tractors, airplane engines, tanks, marine gas engines, armored cars, motorcycles, bicycles, ammunition, antiaircraft guns, helmets, caissons, submarine chasers, ambulances, and field kitchens. And while 1918 resulted in reduced car production, a real or imagined gasoline shortage, and a voluntary Sunday driving abstinence day, the auto mobile industry bounced back with a peacetime reconversion in 1919 during which 820,400 motor vehicles were made. The entire episode foreshadowed WWII productivity, when Detroit automobile manufacturers could rightly be labeled as the “Arsenal of Democracy.”

Wednesday, January 18, 2023

The Ford Model T

View of Henry Ford posing with his first car and the 10 millionth Model T car. Label on back: "Henry Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Company, has lived to see more than 31,000,000 Ford cars and trucks built by his company. Here he is pictured in June 1924 with the 10,000,000th Ford Model T and his first car. From Ford News Bureau. Administration Building. Dearborn, Michigan.

View of workers assembling a Model T automobile

Photographs from the Detroit Public Library

The Model T: What a Car!

            Whether the Model T or A, or subsequent models, Henry Ford’s cars did much to shape life in the twentieth century. For the farmer, county agents now made visits to even isolated farms and rendered scientific advice in an effort to improve crops and agrarian prosperity.81 The automobile was now used to distribute the mail to rural areas, thus vastly improving communications. Farm folk had access to hospitals and other medical facilities. Families no longer had to rely on crossroad stores, but could shop in towns, and even do comparison shopping. For city folk, the changes were no less dramatic. The city became reconfigured, with the rise of new suburbs, and in more recent times, exurbs. Retail trade moved from center city to suburbs, which witnessed the rise of shopping centers and supermarkets. A number of key industries burgeoned due to the demand for materials used in automobile production:  steel, glass, textiles, electronics, and rubber. Relationships within tradition of family structures changed, as youth sought freedom behind the wheel.69 And with the Ford automobile, America became a nation on wheels. Family vacations, and trips to parks, now became far more commonplace. 

            The highway was now a place for adventure, for both men and women, as exemplified in the journals of Rose Wilder Lane and Helen Dore Boylston. The pair traveled from Paris to Albania in a Model T Ford during the mid-1920s and left a remarkable written account. As they would assert, the hero of the trip was neither one of the women, but the car itself, named Zenobia. The maroon Ford was described as “a wonder. She went up all those frightful curving mountain roads like a bird.”70 It was an eloquent appraisal of a mass produced car whose very name implied that it was a living thing. 

            Despite all of the critiques leveled at Ford, his company, and mass production, his machine was simply remarkable. Its dashboard had a gasoline gauge, speedometer, oil gauge (there was no dipstick) temperature indicator, and odometer. To start the car one put on the hand brake, got out of the car, reached below the radiator and turned the crank, and hopefully the engine would come to life after a cough and sputter. The car had two gears, high and low, and instead of a gear shift one had a foot pedal, which the driver pushed down for low and released for high. To go to neutral, one pushed the pedal halfway. To stop the car, one pushed the gear pedal halfway while at the same time pushing down on the brake. There was no accelerator pedal; rather, there was a lever on the steering column that when pushed, gave more gas. There was also a spark lever that often did little unless in the wrong position, which then caused a loud and embarrassing backfire. To engage reverse there was a third foot pedal. Depressed with either foot, you backed up. Steering was stiff, and the wheel itself abruptly snapped back to its original position when one released tension on it. One final note on the Model T: the four-door version actually had only three doors, with the driver’s side door not a door at all – it did not open. The contours of the door were merely stamped on the body at the factory. Entering the car from the left side required climbing over the fake door. In sum, with the Model T rural Americans no longer saw the car as a devil wagon, but rather as transportation technology that could meet and be modified for their varied needs.71

            The Model T was also a machine that was unique to the individual who owned it, and thus a personal relationship invariably followed. John Steinbeck wrote this about a car that he did not name, but called “IT:”

            I think I loved that car more than any I have ever had. It understood me. It had an intelligence not exactly malicious, but it did love a practical joke. . . . When I consider how much time it took to keep IT running, I wonder if there was time for anything else, and maybe there wasn’t. The Model T was not a car as we know them now – it was a person – crotchety and mean, frolicsome and full of jokes – just when you were ready to kill yourself, it would run five miles with no gasoline whatever. I understood IT, but as I have said before, IT understood me, too. It magnified some of my faults, corrected others. It worked on the sin of impatience; it destroyed the sin of vanity. And it helped to establish an almost Oriental philosophy of acceptance.72

            Simple and sturdy, with a high ground clearance, the T was easily repaired by any mechanic-farmer possessing only a few hand tools. If the radiator sprung a leak, you added an egg to stop fluid loss. The Model T was a car one generation removed from America’s consumer society. At least in 1913, it was sold before there were many dealers with service repair facilities. Responsibility for maintenance and repairs fell to the owner, and in reviewing an early Model T owner’s manual, it is astonishing to note what one was expected to perform on these vehicles.73 For example, every 100 miles, the spindle bolt and steering ball should be oiled; at 200 miles, oil had to be applied to the front and rear spring hangers, the hub brake cam, and the commutator; other service had to be performed at 500 and 600 miles. The sophistication and difficulty of repairs is also a surprise to the modern automobile owner. Work described in the section “How to Run the Model T Ford,” included valve grinding, carburetor overhaul, clutch adjustment, the removal of cylinder head and transmission bands, the removal of front and rear axles, and the adjustment of connecting rod bearings. It is no surprise then, that the Model T was the responsible for a generation of do-it-yourself automobile mechanics. Also, it is quite a contrast to compare the 1913 manual to that of the Model A’s 1931 Instruction Book that opens with the statement “Let experienced mechanics make repairs or adjustments. Your car is too valuable a piece of machinery to place in unskilled hands.”74

            The topic of many jokes, there was also a true admiration for this remarkable machine, early models of which had to be driven backwards over steep hills because of the gravity-fed fuel system. In 1915 the first of two volumes about the Model T, entitled Funny Stories About the Ford, was published.75 The following are a few excerpts:

The Formula in Poetry

A little spark, a little coil,

A little gas, a little oil,

A piece of tin, a two inch board – 

Put them together and you have a Ford.

 

The Twenty-third Psalm

The Ford is my auto; I shall not want another.

It maketh me to lie down beneath it; it soureth my soul.

It leadeth me into the paths of ridicule for its namesake.

Yea though I rife through the valleys I am towed up the hill,

For I fear much evil. Thy rods and thy engines discomfort me;

I anoint my tires with patches; my radiator boileth over;

I repair blowouts in the presence of mine enemies.

Surely, if this thing followeth me all the days of my life,

I shall dwell in the bug-house forever.

            In several important respects, the Henry Ford story was far from over in 1915, although by then he was 52 years old.76 With the coming of World War I, Henry became involved in an abortive peace ship effort in 1916. Despite the railing of all of his critics, his pacifism was reflective of a life-long idealism and distrust of the elitist ruling classes. And while the Peace Ship chapter in Ford’s life proved to be a failure, it shows us how complex and yet naĂŻve the man was. He also was idealistic at the Ford Motor Company, at least initially, with his sponsorship of a Sociological Department in 1915 and the opening of the Henry Ford Trade School. His paternalism was perhaps born more out of a desire to control than a sense of compassion. Nevertheless, it was corporate paternalism practiced on a scale that differed little from that of John Patterson at the National Cash Register Corporation. 

Tuesday, January 17, 2023

Henry Ford, Upton Sinclair, and “The Flivver King"



Upton Sinclair (1878-1968)

The Flivver King

            In 1937 Henry Ford’s mass production methods, subsequent Prussification of the Ford Motor Company, and the everyday lives of his workers received a pointed social critique by Upton Sinclair. Reflective of the desperation of the working class during the depths of the Great Depression and penned in the tradition of Oil and The Jungle, Sinclair’s The Flivver King: The Story of Ford America, portrayed Henry Ford as a despot possessing both a benevolent and oppressive streak. Sinclair’s central character was not Henry Ford, however, but the “everyman” Abner Shutt. Shutt experienced many of the vicissitudes typical of those working in the early automobile industry. He began his career as a machinist for the Perfection Tool Company, but left because he had no opportunities for promotion. Abner personally approached Henry Ford and asked for a job. He was put to work immediately. As Sinclair recounted, “Abner Shutt became a cog in the machine which had been conceived in the brain of Henry Ford,” and Ford was “going to the thinking, not merely for himself, but for Abner.”58 Abner was responsible for several tasks on the assembly line: he would roll two wheels at a time to a nearly finished car, push each wheel on the axle and with a wrench screw on the “spindle nut.” Additionally, he placed an alarm-bell and a lantern on the front of each car, finally carrying cushion seats to the car where he wiped the dust from them. For his work, Abner was paid seventeen and a half cents per hour. Sinclair concluded “What more could a workingman ask for?’59

            After Abner had mastered several assembly tasks, he worked up the courage to recommend to Mr. Ford the formation of a wheels department. His suggestion was well received, since it came at a time when Ford and his engineering associates were making process improvements. Soon two labor gangs were formed – one for the right wheel and another for the left. Abner was rewarded by a promotion to sub-foreman and a specialist in spindle nut-screwing. He was paid two dollars and seventy-five cents per day to make sure four men screwed nuts correctly. With the advent of the assembly line in 1913, Abner kept his sub-foreman position but now oversaw, “a group of men, whose every motion had been calculated by an engineer.”60

            Shortly thereafter, Ford’s implementation of the five dollar, 8 hour day marked a high point in his benevolent paternalism. After agents of the Sociological Department instructed the Shutts on proper domestic practices, Abner had “qualified” to receive the bonuses. Sinclair wrote, “it passed Abner’s comprehension how any man or woman could fail to be grateful for such divine compassion on the part of Mr. Ford.”61 However, when Ford promulgated the five dollar-a-day the price of rent and goods rose and all gains were nullified.

            While war raged in Europe, “It had occurred to Abner . . . that it would be a nice thing to buy a Ford Car, and take the family for an outing in the country on Sundays.”62 With a new home and a new car, Abner’s family was plunged into modernity. His wages rose to eight dollars and a quarter a day.63 At the height of Ford’s benevolence, Henry and his workers sought the same end, to win World War I, and “thanks to the efforts of Abner and Henry, America won the war.”64 From 1914 to 1920, Abner drove his Model T to work and gave fellow workers rides for a nickel each way. Later, Abner embodied the mythical common American man:  he raised his family, went to church, and even joined the Ku Klux Klan. 

            Prompted by a harsh recession in 1921 and 1922, Ford shut down his plant and “reorganized.” As Sinclair recounted, “Abner Shutt had been watching the work of five men, but now one foreman watched the work of twenty men – and Abner was one of the twenty . . . they put him back on the line.”65 Now Abner was victim of the division of labor, and a chassis came to him with the spindle nuts screwed on. It was his job to put in a cotter-pin and spread it. After twenty-two years of service, a straw-boss who had been on the job for two years “rode” old Abner Shutt. 

            While Henry Ford had argued that the purpose of scientific management was to discover how much work each worker could do without strain, the “speed-up” and the “stretch-out” strained Abner’s body to the limit. Sinclair described the now-divergent lives of Abner and Ford: “He [Ford] was going everywhere and doing everything except watching the assembly line of his huge factory . . . With 200,000 slaves making themselves parts of machines – pick-up, push-in, turn, reverse – pick-up, push-in, turn, reverse, pickuppushinturnreverse, pickuppushinturnreverse.”66 Abner was one of 100,000 men laid off when Ford decided to build the River Rouge Plant. Five months later, the plant was completed and Abner Shutt was back at spindle-nut screwing, the work that he understood. 

            When the Depression worsened, Abner was laid off and later fired. S. S. Marquis had been replaced by Harry Bennett, Sinclair commenting that the transition was like “casting out Christ and putting Caesar in his place.” Later Abner got a job as a supply runner at the Ford factory where his son was a machinist. In 1932, Abner marched with autoworkers on Ford’s plant, but after bullets were fired, he quickly fled. In an act of desperation, he wrote a letter to Mrs. Ford, and a service agent investigated his file. Due to his long service with the Ford Motor Company, Abner received a job inserting small screws on the magneto assembly line two days a week, for $8. He kept this position for the rest of the novel, but alienation and destruction came to fruition in Abner’s family. John, his son, suffered the same fate as his father – out of work and deeply in debt. Abner’s second son Hank became a rum-runner and then worked in the Ford Service Department. His daughter Daisy went to college to become a stenographer with the hopes of working in an office and marrying a rich man. She married a bookkeeper, the Depression hit, and Sinclair coldly observed that “when poverty comes in at the door, love flies out at the window.”67 Abner’s son Tom, a star high school quarterback, shunned sports for a college education at the University of Michigan. After Tom was radicalized by academe, he chose to work in the shops organizing unions. The novel ends with Tom being systematically beaten by Henry Ford’s thugs. Sinclair morosely observed that, “From the lottery wheel of life, some boys draw lucky years and grow up in times of peace and have a chance for happy lives…others grow up to find its war time; they are dragged from their homes, marched into battle, and shot to pieces.”68

Monday, January 16, 2023

Hooning -- Muscle Cars Takeover Downtown Dayton, Ohio ! (The First Takeover of 2023)


A bit of anarchy on the streets of Dayton. Young people have been doing this kind of thing -- street racing, drifting, stunts drive-by --- for decades. It is an expression of youth rebellion and a celebration of freedom.  As long as no one gets hurt, all that results is a need for new tires and some gas. These events have some organization and self-policing. 
Of course city officials are dismayed and not happy. But frankly, given the violence on Dayton’s streets -- the shootings, murders, assaults, auto thefts -- things could be much worse.