Choices Made: Competition from Steam Engines and Electric
Motors
The early
designs of the internal combustion engine were primitive to say the least, and
thus these power plants were anything but reliable and smooth running. At the
turn of the century steam cars dominated the automotive field. An alternative
was the electric car; but they were expensive and limited in range and speed.
As it turned out, there was a short window of time in which these three
technological rivals were engaged in a contest that revolved around which would
be the chief power source for this new form of flexible and personal
transportation, the automobile. The end result would have enormous consequences
for the remainder of the twentieth century, economically and environmentally.
As Tom McCarthy has pointed out, during the first decade of the twentieth
century, a number of experts warned of the environmental consequences of ICE-powered
vehicles, including the issues of oil depletion and toxic exhausts. However,
McCarthy contends that the widespread adoption of the automobile by a consuming
public allayed concerns at a time when adjustments could have been far more
easily made than those that we, in the early twenty-first century, are now
making.21
Steam had a
long history going back to the eighteenth century as the chief power source for
factories, railroad locomotives, and electrical generation. For automobiles,
steam engines were quieter than internal combustion. With fewer moving parts,
steam engines had been manufactured for generations, and with less exacting
tolerances. In addition, a steam engine had remarkable torque, especially from
a dead stop. Steam pressure could be built up and stored, to be released at
full force on demand. An internal combustion engine must turn within a narrow
range of revolutions per minute to operate efficiently. Additionally, as anyone
who has looked at a schematic of a transmission or differential knows, gears
and small parts result in a power transmission system that can only be deemed
ingenious to the mechanically uninitiated. Moreover, in the cylinder of a gas
engine, the greatest force is exerted at the explosive instant of ignition,
with the power dissipating as the piston completes its stroke. But in the
cylinder of a steam engine, the steam enters, expands and continues to push for
as much as 90 percent of the stroke.
Steam
engines had both limitations and advantages.22 With its extensive piping
and metalwork, a steam car was heavier than an ICE car of comparable
horsepower. Steam engines ran at lower thermal efficiencies than gas engines,
losing much of their heat to the atmosphere. And while the working parts of a
steam engine were quite simple and durable, the ancillary equipment – boiler,
burner, and all manner of pumps, valves, and gauges – were dauntingly complex,
demanding constant attention and maintenance. Most critically, the popular
steam cars of the early 1900s – Stanley, White, and Locomobile – took 10 to 30
minutes to work up adequate steam pressure from a cold start and then had to
stop for water every 30 to 100 miles. ICE-powered cars started faster and had
greater range, an advantage in rural areas where service stations were sparse.
1904 White Steam Car
After the
turn of the century, steam car technology remained essentially stagnant for
years until Abner Doble introduced advanced designs, while ICE-powered cars
quickly improved. By the end of the first decade of the twentieth century,
steam cars were technologically obsolete and economically unviable. Given these
winds of change, White and Locomobile both converted to internal combustion by
1910, leaving only Stanley to fill a market with a curiosity that in recent
times has been resurrected in as an interest in “buff” circles by car collector
and comedian Jay Leno.
In addition
to the ICE- and steam-driven automobiles, there were also electric models at
the turn of the century, partly the consequence of work by Thomas Edison and
others related to improved battery designs.23 Electrics had several
distinct advantages. They were especially attractive to those in the taxi
business and women who wished to avoid the crank starting, noise, vibration,
and pollution of ICE-powered vehicles. Low-end torque characteristics of
electric motors ensured quick starts. However, in the early twentieth century
any advantages were greatly outweighed by the many serious liabilities.
Electrics were far more expensive than the gasoline automobile to manufacture
and about three times more expensive to operate. Batteries could weigh a ton or
more. There was the ever-present wire or cord that had to connect to a
discharged electric car. As late as 1910, their range was only 50 to 80 miles
on a battery charge, charging facilities were virtually nonexistent outside
large cities, the storage batteries of the day deteriorated rapidly, and its
hill climbing ability was poor due to excessive weight of the batteries for the
horsepower generated.24 These relative liabilities have persisted to
the present, despite recent improvement in storage batteries.
No comments:
Post a Comment